 |
From: Chuck (ip307-17.dialup.edisontel.com)
Subject: Re: David Wolfe plagiarism [are we sure ??!!]
Date: April 8, 2003 at 4:39 am PST
In Reply to: David Wolfe plagiarism posted by ricthuse on April 7, 2003 at 2:05 pm:
Rick, I wouldn't so easily believe to what these two (Peter and Kirt) says.
I'm not saying that Natural First Law can't be a plagiarism, only that these information are not enough TRUSTWORTHY to come to conclusion.
This information come from a thread of meat eater (Paleo Diet) and much of the nonsense there have been written by Tom Billings.
I tend to think that they just changed a little what they read on Natural First Law and then they told you that "that-paragraphs" come from the original book "Raw Food Eating".
Any evidence ?
No, from what they posted.
Raw food eating is out of print and we have two people that mysteriously got two copies of the book, and they're against raw vegan but not in a normal way as Billing is know to really hate and hatefully attack raw foodist.
AS long as I don't put my hand in a "Raw Food Eating" copy, this imaginary plagiarism is just a scam created by people who hate vegans.
Their intent was of course to tear down the whole raw food vegan movement by "showing" that Natural First Law is a plagiarized version of a unfindable book
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup
|
