Reply To This Post         Return to Posts Index           VegSource Home

From:	Jeff Novick, MS, RD, LD, LN (novick.vegsource.com)
Subject:	Re: Your 2 points
Date:	October 21, 2007 at 1:41 pm PST

In Reply to: Re: Your 2 points posted by gary on October 21, 2007 at 1:25 pm:

>>> i don't know what sort of evidence you would accept. so you might want to let me know what you would find acceptable.

You raised these points that (based on some assumptions you are making) you apparently do not like the criteria or evidence I am using or we are using here in these discussion.

So, I simply asked you to explain the criteria and evidence you use.

What would I accept?

I would settle for the same or no less than you asked for here on Dr Grahams rawfood board the other day..

http://www.vegsource.com/talk/raw/messages/99935902.html

When you said..

++++++++++++(Begin Quote)+++++++++++++++++++++++
From: gary
(pool-71-98-136-89.tampfl.dsl-w.verizon.net)
Subject:
Re: Matt Monarch's Newsletter on Fruit vs Fat
Date: October 11, 2007 at 11:26 am PST

In Reply to: Re: Matt Monarch's Newsletter on Fruit vs Fat posted by Chumly on October 11, 2007 at 9:51 am:

several raw people lean on bisci but bisci has not submitted any proof of his assertions, nor has mr monarch. this is no different from HHI claiming that high fruit causes cancer but they don't offer any good evidence. doesn't anyone offer any evidence of anything anymore? what am i supposed to believe on, Faith?

++++++++++++(End Quote)+++++++++++++++++++++++

I can only echo your own words... "doesn't anyone offer any evidence of anything anymore?. what i am supposed to beleive on, Faith?"

It's your call.

Thank You
Jeff

Reply To This Post         Return to Posts Index           VegSource Home