 |
From: TSS (216-119-136-13.ipset16.wt.net)
Subject: GW and his Looney GOONS (Tom Delay Sugarland) risk American lives BSE/CJD FRENCH BOVINE BLOOD WINE (blackmail)
Date: February 12, 2003 at 8:50 am PST
Subject: GW and his Looney GOONS (Tom Delay Sugarland) risk American lives BSE/CJD FRENCH BOVINE BLOOD WINE (blackmail)
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:00:16 -0600
From: "Terry S. Singeltary Sr."
To: Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy
CC: bloodcjd@yahoogroups.comGW and his Loony GOONS (Tom Delay Sugarland) risk American lives BSE/CJD
FRENCH BOVINE BLOOD WINE (blackmail) Greetings list members, oh what webs we weave, when all we do is practice to deceive. i try and not mention politics and different party race
when i speak of TSEs. but it has become more and more
difficult to do this. and today, well, this report speaks
for itself, and just goes further in proving what i have
said all along. there is not really a tactful way for
me to say this, but i will try and be diplomatic.
but it needs to be said. please allow me to put my foot in my mouth for one moment
again, and this is just my opinion, i try not to post my
opinion anymore to often, due to the flak, but this needs to
be said. this really upsets me. for years these so called politicians
have failed to warn you about bovine blood in French
wine, and the potential risk it poses to BSE aka MAD COW DISEASE
AND the potential for CJD. but does these folks try to warn
the American public? not one time (i did several years
ago, right here on this list); Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 12:13:52 -0500
Reply-To: Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy
Sender: Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy BSE-L
From: "Terry S. Singeltary Sr."
Subject: COW BLOOD WINE MIGHT BE IN UK.....From: Terry S. Singeltary Sr., Bacliff, Texas -- The Telegraph is
reporting that: THOUSANDS of bottles of French wine containing dried cow's blood could
be on sale in the UK despite a ban on the use of the product following
the BSE scare. French authorities have seized 100,000 suspect bottles thought to
contain the blood - used in cheaper table wines to make them clearer -
after a swoop on 14 vineyards in the Cotes du Rhone area. Investigators
found a ton of dried cow's blood in the raid on the area, which exports
millions of bottles of table wine to Britain every year. Analysts are now examining samples from dozens more vineyards. The use
of cow's blood was banned two years ago as a precautionary measure
following the BSE crisis............... Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:39:27 -0500
Reply-To: Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy
Sender: Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy From: "Terry S. Singeltary Sr."
Subject: Re: Wine and nvCJDHello Mr. LaBudde, would any of this wine be imported? and if so, to
where? Thanks, Terry "Robert A. LaBudde" wrote: > > Consider the issue outlined in: > > "CJD
(NEW VARIANT), WINE ALERT - FRANCE >
******************************************* > A ProMED-mail post >
> [see also: > CJD -
risk from blood 990420233344 > CJD (new var.), blood donation
restrictions - USA 990605093745 > CJD (new var.), blood donation
restrictions - USA (02) 990607223230 > CJD (new var.), blood donation
restrictions - USA (03) 990608225437] > Date: 25 June, 1999 > Source:
The Times, London [edited] > > French health inspectors have seized more
than 100 000 bottles of Rhone > Valley wine amid fears it might have
been treated with powdered cattle > blood, which has been banned in the
European Union (EU) since 1997 after > concern over mad cow disease. >
As a government swoop on 14 vineyards in the Vaucluse and Bouches du
Rhone > region revealed blood could still be being added illegally to
wine as a > purifying substance. One French table-wine exporter, Jean
Pistonier, said > millions of bottles of wine containing ox blood could
have been exported to > Britain in the years after the ban. > Blood is
traditionally used after vinification to clarify the wine by >
eliminating resin and suspended particles. > The Rhone Valley regional
Wine and Spirits Inspection Office said 480lb of > purifying products
based on cow's blood had been seized, with more than 100 > 000 bottles
of suspect wine between June 7 and 14 [1999] in the region > around
Avignon. > Although the vineyards and wine wholesalers involved were
located in areas > that carry the renowned Cotes de Provence and Cotes
du Rhone AOC or > "appellation d'origine controlee" -- the French label
guaranteeing quality > wines -- three quarters of the impounded wine
carried the lower quality VDQS > table-wine label. However, the
equivalent of 27 000 bottles of an AOC > "natural sweet wine" was seized
by inspectors. > Gerard Bedos, who heads the regional Consumer and
Anti-Fraud Office in > Marseilles, assured customers yesterday the Cotes
du Rhone and Cotes de > Provence AOC wines were not involved. The
impounded wine is being tested to > determine whether it has been
treated with ox blood. > Dried cow's blood had been used for centuries
to purify wine until the > European Union banned it as a precautionary
measure in November 1997 after > scientists found links between bovine
spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) and > the human brain disorder
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD). > Jamie Quiot, head of the National
Institute of AOC wines, defended the use > of such products. "They are
not toxic at all. We only asked for their > withdrawal to protect our
image," he said. > Emmanuel Lerat, of the National Confederation of AOC
Wine and Spirits > Producers, said the vineyards found using the ox
blood were small producers > using outdated methods such as egg white to
purify wine. Such practices are > increasingly being abandoned for more
modern and efficient methods, notably > using clay-based purifying
substances such as bentonite. > The affair comes as France has suffered
a succession of food scares > involving BSE, dioxin-contaminated poultry
products from Belgium, and > allegations of illness caused by
contaminated Coca-Cola products and French > unpasteurised cheese. >
Wine producers now fear they will be next to suffer the economic >
consequences of customers' fears concerning the safety of their food." >
> 1. Obviously food adulteration is going on at a fast clip in France.
This bodes > ill for compliance in animal feed areas. > > 2. It will be
interesting to see what the wine-drinking history of the nvCJD > victims
is. Conceivably some of the anomalous cases (e.g., vegetarian) might be
> traceable to wine. > > 3. Since prion protein is somewhat
hydrophobic, alcohol would be a better > solvent for transferring an
infectious dose, particularly since uptake from the > intestine is
rapid. > > Mirabile dictu! > >
================================================================ >
Robert A. LaBudde, PhD, PAS, Dpl. ACAFS e-mail: ral@lcfltd.com > Least
Cost Formulations, Ltd. URL: http://lcfltd.com/ > 824 Timberlake Drive
Tel: 757-467-0954 > Virginia Beach, VA 23464-3239 Fax: 757-467-2947 > >
"Vere scire est per causae scire" >
================================================================BUT NOW, when the need to use it as a tool for GW's war mongering
arises, we now have a warning. but not really a warning at all
for the American consumer, only a tool for BLACKMAIL for the
Bush administration. YEP, politics and BSeee at it's finest hour
in the White House. This is a very dangerous administration,
borderline in my opinion, as an 'axis of evil' with the present
administration and some of it's Goons such as Tom Delay... i said it, and i meant it...TSS U.S. Lawmakers Weigh Actions to Punish France, Germany By Jim VandeHei
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, February 12, 2003; Page A16 U.S. lawmakers, angry over France's and Germany's opposition to the
administration's Iraq policies, are considering retaliatory gestures
such as trade sanctions against the French and pressing for the
withdrawal of U.S. troops from Germany. "France and Germany are losing credibility by the day, and they are
losing, I think, status in the world," House Majority Leader Tom DeLay
(R-Tex.) said yesterday. "They are walking a fine line that is very
dangerous." snip... The speaker also is exploring whether the United States should require
"bright orange warning labels" on French wines that are clarified with
bovine blood, a top aide said. "People should know how the French make their wine," Hastert spokesman
John Feehery said. Republicans are trying to determine how much French
wine on the market has been clarified, or essentially made clearer, by
using bovine blood, a process banned after the scare involving bovine
spongiform encephalopathy -- or "mad cow disease" -- in the late 1990s. Two U.S. wine experts contacted by The Washington Post said a few French
wineries used bovine blood as a clarifier before the ban. Such a warning
label for any wine would be akin to a "Mr. Yuck" stamp, one expert said. Feehery said Hastert is frustrated with the French for blocking certain
U.S. farm exports and, more recently, for opposing President Bush's
strategy for confronting Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. snip... http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A59326-2003Feb11.html now, why did it take so long to get an official confirmation
on this, and a warning (more like blackmail). but this is typical
for this administration. you folks that support this administration
feel free to jump right in here and explain to the American
public why it took so long for such a warning, and what else
are they hiding about BSE/TSE? i am awaiting an explanation
about this? just more BSeee about the USDA/FDA triple firewall
TSE protection that has failed terribly. what does this say?
it says they have known about this potential BSE/CJD risk to the
American public for years, but chose to keep it under raps, until
they needed it to further there agenda, to hell with American
consumers... now let me see how far i can stick
my foot in my mouth even further; Protecting America’s Meat,
Poultry and Egg Products
A Report to the Secretary
on the Food Security Initiatives of
the Food Safety and Inspection Service September 11th created the grim
realization that our world can change
in an instant. As President George W.
Bush said, we are now engaged in a
different kind of war – a war with an
elusive enemy, no rules, no
boundaries and no timeframe for
when it will be over. But what would happen if chemical
agents or harmful bacteria were
intentionally applied to any segment
along the farm-to-table chain? Think
of the hundreds of lives that would be
affected by deliberate contamination,
not to mention the widespread public
fear and economic loss. These are not just hypothetical issues
that can be dismissed with the shrug
of a shoulder. They need to be taken
seriously, for the unconventional
attacks on September 11th prove to us
that anything is possible in the way of
a potential terrorist strike. Detection
and quick response are key to
preventing an outbreak’s domino-like
effect on our society and economy. snip... • Increased Laboratory Capacity
and Upgraded Security
FSIS sought and received
International Standards Organization
(ISO) certification of all of its
laboratories and completed an overall
security upgrade. The Agency
recently initiated construction on a
new Biosecurity Level-3 laboratory
and developed an extensive inventory
of biological isolates housed and
maintained at its laboratories. It also
instituted Evidence Management
procedures to assure proper chain of
custody and other controls on all
samples and materials received by the
labs. The FSIS laboratories
participate in the Laboratory
Response Network, the CDCsponsored
system that provides
training and microbiological methods
to participating labs. FSIS labs also
became participants in the Electronic
Laboratory Exchange Network
(eLEXNET) which is a system
designed to provide a secure network
in which food safety laboratories at
various levels of government can
share food sample and test data. snip... • Enhanced Import Inspection
Soon after the terrorist attacks on the
United States, FSIS inspectors
nationwide were placed on heightened
alert, a condition that remains in
effect today. In addition, FSIS
created a new position, that of import
surveillance liaison inspectors. As of
March of this year, the 20 new import
inspectors will be on duty at port
cities around the nation to augment
the efforts of traditional FSIS import
inspectors assigned to the 146 Import
Houses in the country. Where
traditional USDA import inspectors
examine each shipment and conduct
reinspection activities, these new
import surveillance liaison inspectors
will conduct a broader range of
surveillance activities at each import
facility, as well as extensive records
review. These inspectors will not only
improve the Agency’s ability to
ensure the safety of imported meat,
poultry, and egg products, but as
liaisons, they will also be able to
improve the coordination with other
agencies (e.g., U.S. Customs, APHIS)
concerned with the safety of imported
food products.
Denmark
4%
A rge ntin a
2%
N e w Z e a land
14 %
4%
Canada
49%
9 We have already seen that terrorism
can manifest through the food supply.
An example is the 1984 incident in
Dallas, Oregon. Members of a
religious cult deliberately
contaminated salad bars with the
Salmonella serotype typhimurium. As
a result, 751 people became ill. For a
localized “attack” on the food supply,
this caused a tremendous drain on
medical resources and nationwide fear
of a recurrence.
To ensure food safety, everyone along
the farm-to-table continuum plays an
integral part not only to reduce the
risk of foodborne illnesses but also to
prevent bioterrorist attacks. The extra
care and attention taken all along this
food continuum every day goes a long
way in protecting millions of lives
and our cherished freedoms. http://www.fsis.usda.gov/oa/topics/FoodSecReport.pdf Feb. 11, 2003, 9:31PM
Lawmakers air beef about USDA's role in meat inspections
By EMILY GERSEMA
Associated Press WASHINGTON -- The government still isn't protecting consumers from
contaminated meat a decade after four children died and 700 people were
sickened in an E. coli outbreak linked to hamburgers sold by the Jack in
the Box fast food chain in the West, food safety activists and Democrats
said Tuesday. "Too many families have tragically lost loved ones to preventable
foodborne diseases," said Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin, announcing a new effort
to pass legislation that would give the Agriculture Department authority
to shut down meatpacking plants where inspectors find contaminated meat. Several similar efforts in recent years have failed, but Rep. Rosa
DeLauro, D-Conn., said large meat recalls linked to outbreaks that
killed nine people in 2002 provide an impetus to try again this year. Without such a law, the department cannot enforce food safety
regulations against challenges by meatpackers, said Sen. Richard Durbin,
D-Ill. "I'm sick and tired of secretaries of agriculture coming to me and
saying they don't need that authority," Durbin said. He said the agency clearly needs it in light of a case last month in
which a federal judge in Nebraska issued a temporary restraining order
blocking the USDA from shutting down Nebraska Beef Ltd., a meatpacker. Inspectors suspected the plant had meat contaminated with E. coli bacteria. The government ended up settling out of court, with the company agreeing
to appoint someone to oversee its compliance and review meat safety. The department still can close the plant if it is not abiding by safety
laws. Lawmakers and consumer activists said they worry that the Nebraska case
will become a precedent for what the department will do when challenged
again in court by a meatpacker. Steven Cohen, an Agriculture Department spokesman, said that won't happen. Activists appearing with Durbin, Harkin and other Democrats suggested
that all food inspection should be consolidated into a single agency
instead of divided between the Agriculture Department and the Food and
Drug Administration. The department is too involved in promoting agriculture to regulate meat
plants effectively, said Eric Schlosser, author of Fast Food Nation, a
critical look at the restaurant industry. Schlosser spoke on behalf of Safe Tables Our Priority, an activist group
of families whose relatives were disabled or killed by food poisoning. "We need a strong, single food safety agency, separate from the USDA, so
that the USDA can promote American agriculture, a very good thing, and
the food safety agency can focus on protecting public health," Schlosser
said. He also said the government needs the power to order recalls. Under
current law, only meatpackers and food processors can issue recalls. http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/nation/1774863 Greetings again, President Bush et al does not have to go to Iraq
to bomb innocent woman, children, men and risk the
lives of our men and women for acts of terrorism on
our food supply. it's been going on for decades here
in the USA and it has been done by our own Government,
there lobbiest, and by all the Industries involved$
there are Government lobbiest and Federal agencies and
the Industries involved that have known for decades potential
lethal (100 % lethal/fatal) agents (TSEs) Transmissible
Spongiform Encephalopathy agents have been entering the
human food chain right here in the USA, and they have
gone to great links to cover this up. why dont they bomb
them instead? they hide behind many lies. fact is, all
these TSEs in the USA aka mad cow disease's all transmit
to primates. there has never been transmission studies on
man. but, many are dying from these TSEs in the USA. why
does Bush et al refuse to make CJD/TSEs reportable Nationally
and refuse to have a CJD/TSE Questionnaire to all victims/families
asking real questions as to potential route/source? why does
Bush et al refuse to use TSE rapid testing on USA cattle and
test in numbers to find as all EU STATES in EUROPE? i will
tell you why below, but am sick and tired of Bush et al
ignoring all the problems within the USA, just to go off and
try to finish what his Father did not finish, going off and
start another war, when GW Jr. has not finished what
he started in Afganistan/Pakistan with his hunt for bin
laden? what happened there? who's next? we have al-quida
terrorist cells right here in the USA and evening secret
training camps in Argentina and South America. have we become
the world Police, only for whom GW et al sees fit, while
ignoring all the USA problems within? food terrorism, who is
the real terrorist here? BSE/TSE .1 GRAM LETHAL NEW STUDY SAYS via W.H.O. Dr Maura Ricketts
[BBC radio 4 FARM news] (audio realplayer) http://www.vegsource.com/talk/madcow/messages/9912425.html USA IMPORTS MBM/GREAVES POTENTIALLY TAINTED WITH BSE/TSE Subject:
Re: exports from the U.K. of it's MBM to U.S.???
From:
S.J.Pearsall@esg.maff.gsi.gov.uk
Date:
Tue, 8 Feb 2000 14:03:16 +0000
To:
flounder@wt.net (Receipt Notification Requested) (Non Receipt
Notification Requested) Terry Meat and bonemeal is not specifically classified for overseas trade
purposes. The nearest equivalent is listed as "flours and meals of meat
or offals (including tankage), unfit for human consumption; greaves". UK
exports of this to the US are listed below: Country Tonnes
1980
1981- 12
1982
1983
1984- 10
1985- 2
1986
1987
1988
1989- 20
1990 Data for exports between 1975 and 1979 are not readily available. These
can be obtained (at a charge) from data retailers appointed by HM
Customs and Excise: BTSL (Tel: 01372 463121) or Abacus (01245 252222). Best wishes
Simon Pearsall
Overseas trade statistics Stats (C&F)C Simon
as discussed
thanks
Julie
---
Forwarded message:
Sent: Fri Feb 04 21:47:01 2000
Received: Fri Feb 04 21:45:15 2000 To:
helpline ou=inf o=maff p=maff400 a=attmail c=gb
From:
d=flounder@wt.net ou=smtp o=maff p=maff400 a=attmail c=gb Subject: exports from the U.K. of it's MBM to U.S.??? Hello,
where could I locate data, on the exportation of the U.K.'s meat and
bone
meal, to the U.S., between the years 1975 to 1990?
Thank You
Terry
Is the US still importing meat and edible meat offals from BSE
countries? Correspondent opinion: Terry S. Singeltary Sr
Letter submitted to Atlantic Monthly 15 Sept 98 "I hope these governtment websites help you for 1996 and 1997 imports
-- see under ' meat and edible meat offals' section." Marva Thompson
Foreign Trade Reference Room
202/482-2185 "The U.S. is apparently still importing beef, pork, sheep, and lamb
from countries in which BSE is found [this is probably
completely legal under regulations applicable at time of import--
webmaster]: Bovine anmls bnlss ex prcssd frozen/U.S. Imports for Consumption 1997
year to date (custom value, in thousands of dollars)
(units of quantity: kilograms) United Kingdom 37,122 kilograms, 43 thousand dollars
Netherlands 56,260 kilograms, 413 thousand dollars
Canada 18,141,481 kilograms, 23,914 million dollars Livers of bovine animals, edible, frozen. U.S. Imports for consumption Netherlands 19,230 kilograms, 25 thousand dollars
Canada 160,632 kilograms, 147 thousand dollars Tongues of bovine animals, edible, frozen u.S. Imports for consumption Netherlands 1,047 kilograms, 4 thousand dollars
Canada 767,859 kilograms, 2,028 million Hi-qulty beef cuts w/bone in prcssd f/c u.S. Imports for consumption Canada 25,332 kilograms, 37 thousand dollars Beef cuts w/bone in excpt prcdssd fr/ch u.S. Imports for consumption Netherlands 5,276 kilograms, 30 thousand dollars
Canada 117,142 kilograms, 353 thousand dollars Meat bovine anmls cuts w/bone ex prrocssd fr us imports for consumption Netherlands 51,836 kilograms, 444 thousand dollars
Canada 120,955,010 kilograms, 253,199 million Cattle hides, whole, fresh or wet-salt u.S. Imports for consumption Belgium 1,270 pieces, 112 thousand dollars
United kingdom 36 pieces, 3 thousand dollars
Ireland 12,797 pieces, 839 thousand dollars
Italy 50 pieces, 10 thousand dollars
Fr germany 2,500 pieces, 36 thousand dollars
Canada 1,405,430 pieces, 67,320 million dollars Hides/skins
bovine anmls nesoi whole frh/wet-saltd u.S. Imports for consumption United kingdom 13 pieces, 1 thousand dollars
Italy 4 pieces, 4 thousand dollars
Germany 9,455 pieces, 139 thousand dollars
Canada 567,816 pieces, 17,196 million dollars Cattle hides, whole, fresh or wet-salted u.S. Imports for consumption 1998 year to date
Italy 7 pieces, 2 thousand dollars
Ireland 1,408 pieces, 85 thousand dollars
France 25 pieces 2 thousand dollars
Canada 965,355 pieces, 37,244 million dollars Hides and skins of bovine animals, whole, nesoi, fresh or wet-salted
U.S. Imports for consumption United kingdom 18 pieces, 3 thousand dollars
Sweden 1 pieces, 1 thousand dollars
Italy 2 pieces, 2 thousand dollars
Germany 5,565 pieces, 72 thousand dollars
Canada 84,327 pieces, 2,257 million dollars Sheep, lamb skins, no wool, nesoi, pickled not split, u.S. Imports for
Consumption United kingdom 9,504 pieces, 88 thousand dollars
Sheep, lamb skins, no wool, nesoi, pickled, split u.S. Imports for
Consumption United Kingdom 149,580 pieces, 1,212 million dollars
Netherlands 50,400 pieces, 267 thousand dollars
Italy 4,175 pieces, 64 thousand dollars
France 13,644 pieces, 57 thousand dollars
Canada 131,642 pieces, 241 thousand dollars Carcasses and half-carcasses of swine, frozen u.S. Imports for
consumption United kingdom 85,003 kilograms, 201 thousand dollars
Netherlands 24,000 kilograms, 33 thousand dollars
Ireland 24,567 kilograms, 39 thousand dollars
Fr germany 23,032 kilograms, 32 thousand dollars
Denmark 112,345 kilograms, 168 thousand dollars
Canada 17,889 kilograms, 41 thousand dollars Hams and cuts therof, bone in processed frsh/chld u.S. Imports for
Consumption Belgium 9,406 kilograms, 34 thousand dollars
Canada 95,515 kilograms, 172 thousand dollars
Italy 6,459 kilograms, 86 thousand dollars Flawed inspection of food is a danger, senate panel told 9-11-98 Knight Rider Tribune News The government's current system to check food imports for possible
health dangers is dangerously flawed, experts in the food
business told a Senate subcommittee Thursday. U.S. inspectors
check only 2 percent of all foreign shipments and consistently
issue low penalties to importers who break the rules, experts
said. Unscrupulous importers typically import large amounts of
products that will not pass (Food and Drug Administration)
inspection, said a former West Coast customs broker. He said importers easily bypass inspections by docking at
high-volume ports, such as Los Angeles-Long Beach and New
York, where the inspection force is stretched thin.
Inspections are so low there they virtually pass right through. I hope all of you at THE ATLANTIC MONTHLY find some interest
in this...." http://mad-cow.org/~tom/sept_mid_98_news.html#offals 69. On 14 February 1990, Mr Meldrum wrote a letter to the
Chief Veterinary Officers of a number of countries. [76] On 15
February 1990, Mrs Attridge and other officials were sent a
copy of the letter of 14 February 1990 and a list of the
countries to which it had been sent. They were stated to be
the countries which had imported ruminant based meat
and bone meal from the United Kingdom. The countries listed
were Norway; Sweden, Switzerland, Czechoslovakia,
Hungary, Nigeria, Thailand, South Africa, Malaysia, Taiwan,
Hong Kong, South Korea, Japan, Canada, USA,
Turkey, Kenya, Malta, Libera, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Sri
Lanka, Puerto Rico, Curacao, Finland.[77] The letter from
Mr Meldrum included the following: snip... MBM/U.K. imports of MBM to the U.S./BSE Inquiry http://www.bse.org.uk/dfa/dfa25.htm # Docket No: 02-088-1 RE-Agricultural Bioterrorism Protection Act of
2002; [TSS SUBMISSION ON POTENTIAL FOR BSE/TSE & FMD 'SUITCASE BOMBS'] -
TSS 1/27/03 (0) http://www.vegsource.com/talk/madcow/messages/9912395.html Subject: BSE--U.S. 50 STATE CONFERENCE CALL Jan. 9, 2001
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 16:49:00 -0800
From: "Terry S. Singeltary Sr."
Reply-To: Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy BSE-Lhttp://vegancowboy.org/TSS-part1of8.htm #Docket No. 01-068-1 Risk Reduction Strategies for Potential BSE
Pathways Involving Downer Cattle and Dead Stock of Cattle and Other
Species - TSS 1/21/03 (2) http://www.vegsource.com/talk/madcow/messages/9912348.html In Reply to: Docket No. 01-068-1 Risk Reduction Strategies for Potential
BSE Pathways Involving Downer Cattle and Dead Stock of Cattle and Other
Species [TSS SUBMISSION] January 21, 2003 http://www.vegsource.com/talk/madcow/messages/9912358.html Re: Docket No. 01-068-1 -- (200,000 USA DOWNERS ANNUALLY) TSS 1/21/03 http://www.vegsource.com/talk/madcow/messages/9912360.html Re: Docket No. 02N-0273 – Substances Prohibited From Use In Animal Food
Or Feed; http://www.vegsource.com/talk/madcow/messages/9912338.html # Re: [Docket No. 99-017-2] Blood and Tissue Collection at Slaughtering
Establishments [TSS SUBMISSION] http://www.vegsource.com/talk/madcow/messages/9912402.html My submission to federal gov. on BSE and
the 'lack of' surveillance; https://199.132.50.48/E-Commen.nsf/85255e6f0052055e85255d7f005ed8bc/c147d3037a26dfe285256ab000769557?OpenDocument https://199.132.50.48/E-Commen.nsf/($All)?OpenView https://199.132.50.48/E-Commen.nsf/8178b1c14b1e9b6b8525624f0062fe9f/c147d3037a26dfe285256ab000769557?OpenDocument TSS Submission will be on the 'slides' of the Jan. 19, meeting...tss http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/slides/3681s2.htm CJD WATCH http://www.fortunecity.com/healthclub/cpr/349/part1cjd.htm CJD Watch/NEWS message board http://disc.server.com/Indices/167318.html USA GBR risk assessment on BSE _MUST_ be changed to
include all animal TSEs ASAP. GBR BSE risk assessment of the USA should be changed to
GBR III immediately. http://www.testcowsnow.com USA MAD COW cover-up http://www.vegsource.com/talk/lyman/messages/9558.html TSS
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup
|
