|
||||||||||||||||||
 |
From: TSS ()
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Agriculture Department may need up to two weeks to determine if a suspect older animal was infected with mad cow disease, the department's chief veterinarian told Reuters on Saturday. John Clifford, the USDA's top veterinarian, said tests will be carried out at the USDA laboratory in Ames, Iowa, and at an internationally known facility in Weybridge, England, to determine if the animal is infected. The USDA reported late on Friday that an animal tested positive for the brain-wasting disease, reigniting fears that foreign countries would shun U.S. beef again. The government said the suspect animal, first tested in November, did not enter the human food or livestock feed supply because it was unable to walk when delivered for slaughter. The only confirmed U.S. case of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), or mad cow disease, was found in December 2003 in a Washington state dairy cow. The discovery halted billions of dollars worth of American beef exports. Clifford said USDA scientists were drawing up a detailed testing plan for the suspect animal. A decision on exactly how many tests, and what types, was expected by late next week, he said. "We want to make sure that everybody agrees on the tests that should be done," Clifford said in an interview. A key first step, he said, is for the USDA to conduct additional analyzes on the animal's remaining brain sample to ensure that enough tissue was still available for testing in England. Only 12.5 grams (0.4 ounces) of the animal's brain remained, he said. Several tests ranging in sophistication can determine mad cow disease, and some require a larger amount of brain tissue. The USDA was mulling whether to wait and make only one announcement when all the tests were complete, a process that could take up to two weeks, Clifford said. Clifford declined to say where the animal was slaughtered or give details about its sex or breed. "We are not ready to divulge that information," he said. FOOD SAFETY CONCERNS The senior Democrat on the House Appropriations subcommittee on agriculture, Rep. Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut, urged the USDA to implement stronger safeguards to protect consumers and cattle from mad cow disease. "The possibility of a second case of mad cow in America raises concerns over the integrity of our cattle," she said in a statement. USDA spokesman Ed Loyd said department scientists were already at work. "We are running it through again to ensure the results," Loyd said. "We want to also ensure we send samples to Weybridge that are adequate enough for them to conduct appropriate testing that allows for a valid result." Washington has informed all of its agricultural attaches with U.S. embassies around the world about the suspect animal. "Certainly an important part of what we do over the next few days will be to keep all of our trading partners informed of our progress," Loyd said. Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns, who announced the possible mad cow disease on Friday evening, said the incident should not impact U.S. beef trade. Since becoming chief of the USDA earlier this year, Johanns has repeatedly said that his top priority is to restore American beef export trade. USDA officials have been pressing for resumed purchases of American beef by Japan and South Korea, which suspended purchases in December 2003. Before its ban, Japan was the No. 1 beef market for the United States, buying $1.4 billion annually. South Korea was its third-largest market. The Japanese government agreed in principle in October to resume beef imports from American cattle aged 20 months or younger, but insisted shipments would not resume until its independent commission declared U.S. beef was safe to eat. Current negotiations with South Korea center on beef from animals under 30 months. The USDA said the suspect animal's brain tested positive for BSE in a rapid, preliminary test in November. When immediately retested with more sophisticated technology, it was found free of the disease. But the USDA's inspector general asked scientists on Wednesday to retest the animal using a third kind of technology known as the "Western blot" test. The animal tested positive late on Friday. The Western blot test was requested by a consumer group in February, which said it was the most definitive test available. http://www.reuters.ca/locales/c_newsArticle.jsp;:42ac06e3:7561885da5ab7671?type=topNews&localeKey=en_CA&storyID=8763427 > US mad cow test results may take two weeks - USDA "And as you know, now nearly a year ago or maybe even more than a It's delicious The main burden of placating the public fell on the shoulders of Agriculture see Gummer force feed his daughter hamburger; http://www.maddeer.org/gummer.html Wednesday, 11 October, 2000, 16:19 GMT 17:19 UK John Gummer: Beef eater Probably the most derided politician to emerge out of the BSE scandal, John Gummer will always be remembered for making great public show of feeding his four-year-old daughter Cordelia a hamburger in the midst of the "mad cow" disease scare. Just six days before, it had emerged a cat had died of a BSE-like disease and six months earlier the government itself had banned beef offal for human consumption. Eight years passed - and 32 people had died of CJD, the human form of BSE - before Mr Gummer was obliged to justify his action to the public inquiry on BSE. 'Perfectly safe' In December last year, he told the panel he had no regrets about his strenuous efforts to appease public fears with blanket statements that beef was "perfectly safe". "Adults, about themselves, may take a certain kind of risk," said the father of four. "They smoke and of all sorts of things. The only fair question, I think, before I made a comment to the public was that I thought this was safe for my children to eat." Delayed ban on offal He also told the inquiry he had delayed a ban on beef offal in 1989 because he did not believe it was "essential for public health" because the Southwood report on the issue had only suggested a ban. At the end of the hearing, the panel asked him if the BSE crisis had changed his eating habits. He told them that if anything he ate more beef because it was cheaper that it used to be. Yet Mr Gummer's political career remained unscathed. The MP for Suffolk Coastal remained Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food until 1993 when he was made Secretary of State for the Environment until Labour took power in 1997. Now on the backbenches, he is regarded as one of the "greenest" Conservatives with strong views on on global warming and town planning. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/369625.stm THEN WE HAVE Prime Minister Jean Chretien of Canada with the same lies; Prime Minister Jean Chretien shows that Canadian beef is safe by having it for lunch at a Ottawa restaurant Wednesday. Photo: Dave Chan/ CP http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20030522.wcows0522_2/BNStory/National/ AND THEN YOU HAVE GW and his humour; Canadian beef "I proudly ate some Alberta beef last night and I'm still standing," Bush joked at his final public appearance in Halifax. Still, after the visit, the American border remained closed to Canadian beef as it has since May 2003, after a cow in Alberta tested positive for mad cow disease. http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/continentaldivide/ COMMODITIES AND FUTURES, to hell with human health. NOT enough body bags. IT is what you call an acceptable death rate. WITH _documented_ (key word is documented) death this low, it is an acceptable death rate for a particular commodity. THE sad part is they are not using all the science. only a small portion of it. only the portion that fits there needs $$$ THE nvCJD/BSE only theory is total crap (BSeee) and everyone knows it... TSS
|
