Follow Ups | Post Followup | Back to Discussion Board | VegSource
See spam or
inappropriate posts?
Please let us know.

From: TSS ()
Subject: Cattle Renderings Could Fuel North American Cement Kilns
Date: January 18, 2006 at 12:02 pm PST

finance & business

Cattle Renderings Could Fuel North American Cement Kilns 1/23/2006
By William J. Angelo

Some European and Japanese cement manufacturers have started using animal renderings as kiln fuel, saving fossil-fuel costs while disposing of banned material. The practice could soon come to North America.

Hot Stuff. High BTU value could make MBM useful for cement kiln fuel. (Photo courtesy of LaFarge North America, Inc.)
Disposing of ruminant meat and bone meal, or MBM, has been an environmental problem since the mid-1990s, when its use as animal feed was banned in Europe following outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE), better known as mad-cow disease. Infectious and virtually indestructible proteins called prions, which are found in animal brains and spinal cords, cause BSE and its human variant, Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (vCJD). The diseases are always fatal but now the unwanted byproduct of the meat-processing industry may face a promising future that could cut energy costs for American cement producers. Domestically, it could also raise unresolved issues concerning waste transport, storage, surface and groundwater contamination and airborne emissions.

According to the Skokie, Ill.-based Portland Cement Association, U.S. cement consumption was about 120.7 tonnes in 2005 and projected to rise 5 million tonnes more this year. Currently 33 cement companies operate 115 plants in 37 states and almost 80% are foreign owned. Portland cement, which is made from calcium, silicon, aluminum, iron and other additives, is manufactured by either a wet or dry process that combines the raw materials and heats them up to 2,700°F in huge rotary kilns to form clinker. Clinker is combined with gypsum to form cement, which then is combined with sand, water and gravel to form concrete. The kilns require a steady energy source such as pulverized coal. The flame comes into contact with the cement materials as they move through the kiln.

In August 2004, the law firm of Foley & Lardner LLP, Washington, D.C., representing Lafarge North America Inc., wrote a letter to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration about using MBM as kiln fuel. It cited Lafarge's positive experience in Europe and Japan and noted that "cement kilns destroy organic constituencies with an efficiency of 99.9999%." The letter further noted that "Ruminant byproduct material has a high Btu level, which makes it a potentially useful substitute for a portion of fossil fuel being fed to fire cement kilns."

According to the National Renderers Association, Alexandria, Va., the European Union has over a 400,000-ton MBM disposal backlog. When not used in kilns MBM is either incinerated or landfilled there. Since the U.S. banned MBM from cattle feed in 1997, the 2 million tonnes annually produced here now is used in pet food, aquaculture and chicken feed. "In the U.S., MBM is ground up and heated into a powder and dried," says Kent J. Swisher, NRA vice president. "We have very low storage capacity because the renderers move it quickly in bulk containers, rail cars or hopper-bottom trailers, which can also carry other products."

Since the mad-cow scare originated in England, there have been only two cases of the disease in the U.S., which prompted an effective feed ban and high level of surveillance. And the public's taste for meat remains unabated. "We have all this organic material, which has a huge Btu value so it has potential for fuel and some North American firms are exploring the option," says Andrew T. O'Hare, PCA vice president regulatory affairs. "But before individual cement plants can utilize it, community concerns will have to be addressed, most likely through a state or local process. There are no federal regulations that I am aware of regarding MBM usage at cement plants."

Kerry S. Humphrey, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency press officer, says that EPA does not have a position on burning MBM and is not planning any regulations at this time. The same holds true for the FDA.


Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

E-mail: (optional)


Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL: