"Not Milk?": Dairy Petitions the FDA to Block Labels Like "Soy Milk" on Non-Dairy Products | SHERRY F. COLB | 05/12/10

  • digg
  • Delicious
  • Furl
  • reddit
  • Technorati
  • stumbleupon

Read More: dairy, petition, soymilk

Get VegSource Alerts Get VegSource Alerts

First Name


Email This Story to a Friend

At the end of April, the National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF) petitioned the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to stop producers of non-dairy food from using terms such as "milk," "cheese," "ice-cream," "sour cream," and "yogurt" on their product labels. The NMPF characterizes such labeling as a misappropriation of "traditional dairy terms" and contends that "[f]ood labels should clearly and accurately identify the true nature of the food to the consumer. These companies should not be permitted to represent their products as something they are not."

The FDA has issued regulations that support the NMPF's view of words like "milk" and "cheese" and that define such products as essentially dairy in nature. Furthermore, according to the NMPF petition, the FDA has sent warning letters to producers of dairy-free products accusing them of misbranding food by labeling it with words identified with animal ingredients.

The FDA, in other words, appears to agree with the NMPF's contention that producers of dairy-free products mislead the public by using such words as "milk" and "cheese" in labeling.

In this column, I will examine the underlying contention that dairy-free milks including Wildwood Soymilk, Almond Breeze Almondmilk or Whole Foods Ricemilk, nondairy cheeses such as Daiya vegan shreds and Follow Your Heart Cream Cheese, and non-dairy ice-creams like So Delicious and Purely Decadent are engaged in misleading the public about the nature of their products.

Accuracy in Labeling: Lacteal Secretions

In its petition to the FDA, the NMPF emphasizes the importance of accuracy in labeling. The petition states that "[t]hese products [the ones that use "dairy terminology" in various incarnations] should be relabeled to more accurately describe the nature of the food . . ." A consumer interested in purchasing cows' milk, cheese, sour cream, or yogurt, in other words, should be able to understand, when she reads the label and the ingredients on a food product, precisely what she is - and what she is not - purchasing. Words that falsely connote dairy products thus risk confusing the consumer, according to the NMPF.

Whatever one thinks about dairy products, we should all share the NMPF's expressed desire that consumers (of dairy and other packaged items) fully and accurately understand the nature of the products that they consume. Most people are busy with their lives and cannot afford to spend time divining the origin of the ingredients in their food. Accuracy in labeling protects and justifies the trust of consumers, who may not have occasion to think much about what it is that they are purchasing and consuming when they visit the local grocery.

Though one will not likely encounter this precise definition on a container of dairy milk, the NMPF's petition explains that "the term 'milk' refers to the lacteal secretion from a mammal." The federal regulation defining "milk" states more narrowly that "[m]ilk is the lacteal secretion, practically free from colostrum, obtained by the complete milking of one or more healthy cows." (Colostrum is the very early lacteal secretion that mammals produce for their newborn young; it has a different texture and appearance from milk).

Cows' milk, in other words, is the breast milk that a mother cow produces in her body when she gives birth to a baby calf. This is a familiar process, as human females - also mammals - produce milk when they give birth to baby humans. Unlike human babies who nurse with their mothers until their mothers are ready to wean them, however, the baby calf on a dairy farm is forcibly removed from his mother's side while he is still young enough to continue nursing, so that dairy farmers can allow the human population to drink and eat the mother's lacteal secretions. (Humans appear to be the only mammals who continue to drink breast milk into adulthood and who routinely feed, at any time in their lives, on the breast milk of a different animal.)

Consumers might rightly wonder what happens to the baby calf after he is taken from his mother. If he is a boy (and roughly half of a cow's babies are boys), he will be sold and slaughtered as veal. If she is a girl, then she will either become veal, like her brothers, or she will be raised to give birth to babies who are taken away from her, so that she too may be forced to provide "lacteal secretions" to satisfy the human population's demand for dairy products such as lacteal milk, lacteal cheese, lacteal yogurt, lacteal ice-cream, and lacteal sour-cream.

Once a farmer can no longer milk mother and daughter for the quantity of dairy that the populace demands, he considers these females "spent" and sends them to slaughter as well.

The wife of a former dairy farmer describes the cows' and their calves' experience as follows:

"I learned that dairy cows have to be bred every year in order to continue to produce milk, and how their calves are taken from them shortly after birth--they're lucky if they get colostrum from their mom, which is the first milk that is important for their survival. While some of the calves are kept as replacement heifers, most of them are sent to slaughter or the veal operations, which is a very short life, and not a happy life.... The verbalizations made by mother and baby as they bond are just one small aspect of their emotional lives that we humans tear apart. The mother calls for her baby for many days after they're separated. How can such a thing ever be called 'humane?'"

Dairy consumers ought to know these things when they purchase dairy milk and its derivatives, yet there is nothing on the labels that would give them a hint of it. This may be why some people who consider themselves "ethical vegetarians" still consume dairy products. It would be useful to have dairy items labeled to reflect the fate of their bovine producers.

Read the whole story here.


8 Comments | Leave a comment


In Webster's, the second definition is "the latex of a plant." If they want things to be clear, stick with "soy milk," "almond milk," etc., and change milk from cow's to the author's "lacteal secretion milk." That'll move some product.

It sounds like the dairy industry is anti-capitalism. (Not really--more like they're buying the complicity of the federal government.)


I'm not very happy about this, so I went to the NMPF to find out more. Their website has a form letter to send to the Commissioner of the FDA, so I thought I'd send her my own letter. here's what I wrote:
Dear Commissioner Hamburg,

I recently read about the NMPF lobby trying to prevent alternatives to dairy products from being clearly labeled. I saw that they are mounting a campaign focused on you, so I thought I'd give you a counterpoint to consider.

The NMPF seems to be insisting that there is only one definition for terms like “milk” and “cream.” Of course, that’s not the case. Coconuts are perhaps the most obvious example of a seed plant that produces a typically white fluid called milk, but there are many others as well. Will they be going after medicinal and cosmetic topical creams, next?

If anything, the products that the NMPF are going after are the ones that are actually labeled clearly. Dairy milk does not clearly identify itself as such, and should be required to do so. How else is one to know whether a beverage is secreted from a cow, goat, llama, pig, or other mammal? The NMPF is correct that there is a problem with milk labeling, but they are missing the point that they are the source of that problem.



Sure it covered the ethical issues but that's not where it was leading.
To me the article should have focused on the points - that even "milk" does not meet the true definition of milk. I believe that it was Marion Nestle who covered this. After one has homogenized, pasteurized, skimmed off the fat - is it really milk? What really is that stuff that they call "cottage cheese" or "sour cream". My parent knew what that stuff was - the milk arrived in metal cans and the cream was on top and dairy products all followed from that ....

English is a language that is very far from perfect (speaking as a home schooling parent of kids learning to read!!) where nuts have "meat" and fruit has "flesh". Will someone please clarify where the cream is in "ice cream"?

If the diary industry wants to hold "milks" to account - then let's just hold that mirror back at them!

I'm all for labeling. Please - let's have truth - I want know where the GMO's are, where hormones have been used to increase production of milk, where irradiation has been used, where things came from so that unfair labour practices are used ....


So, does this mean I can start legitimately calling breast milk "boob juice"? Cool! ;-)


What's next? Will they go after peanut butter, apple butter, pumpkin butter, etc. manufacturers? No dairy in those, either (or at least there's not supposed to be!)...


This is really good information. I just wish more people had the desire or nerve to educate themselves about the consequences of their actions and choices. Being vegetarian for 4 years and mostly vegan for 6 months (almost all the way there), I don't think that taking the word "milk" off of non-dairy products will harm sales in the least or help the Dairy Industry. We, for example, choose non-dairy because we know that it does not contain dairy, regardless of whether the label says "milk" or not. Before we stopped drinking dairy, I was never fooled by the word milk on any product because in my mind, life, upbringing etc...milk can mean many things. The word milk was also always accompanied by the appropriate explanation of the type of milk. We drink Soy, Almond, Rice, Hemp MILK precisely because we don't want lacteal secrection dairy MILK. The Dairy Industry is desperately trying to regain lost (educated) consumers under the false assumption that we have all been duped into buying non-dairy, thinking that it is dairy because of that one little word. They are also operating on a disconnected basis with the current and changing consumer desires and awareness, and they are in denial. Call it what you will, I'm buying non-dairy!


I just checked NMPF website and I checked the source code of that e-mail page and when you click the send button the e-mail goes to some IT at . Why they are not sending it directly to the commissioner? Are they filtering and censuring the e-mails? Is that even legal?
Besides, why their list has only “Milk”, “Yogurt”, “Sour Cream”, “Ice Cream”, and “Cheese” but doesn't include butter? Isn't butter dairy product? Of course they know that if they include butter then even the non-vegan people will start laughing at them (imagine you can't say peanut butter anymore). This way they are deciding which veggie source products can have dairy product names like butter, and which ones can not.
Last but not least is the etymology of the word. Just because in English the word milk comes from act of milking a mammal that doesn't mean that it's the same for all languages. For example, in Armenian, the word for milk is "gat" and that comes from "gatil" which is a drop of liquid. So in Armenian you can call a soy milk a milk but in English not. Does it make sense?


Well the dairy farmers are right here, it is not fair for them to use certain terminology if they are not licensed to produce those items!!

Leave a comment