Reply To This Post         Return to Posts Index           VegSource Home

From:	Millie (75.107.206.117)
Subject:	So what if it is "just" his opinion?....
Date:	October 23, 2009 at 2:27 pm PST

In Reply to: He was obviously having a little fun for the audience during part of it. posted by Queen of my Castle on October 23, 2009 at 1:55 pm:

I'm not seeing disclaimers on the "Fair and Balanced" commercials!

And, seriously, the WH doesn't have to give a reason for discrediting a certain anchor or channel.

And, even if this is "just" his opinion....it is stupid, it is dangerous, and it is hate-filled and based on NOTHING.

I hope you take my challenge. It proves the difference between your sources & mine. What is reported should not change the intent of the person speaking. I don't think Media Matters edited anything to change Beck's message but your source, CNS, did.

Now, this is very interesting:
You guys always rely on interpretation rather than exactly what is there to be seen by all:
1) That the health care bill *might* have been changed became a huge RW story (it wasn't - it was a talking point - there was never any indication of this being true).
2) When RWers ARE taken at their word, then we must also rely on your interpretation of what they "really" meant.

I'd rather go by their own words....in context!
M.

Reply To This Post         Return to Posts Index           VegSource Home