Name:
SJT
Gender:
male
Location:
California, USA
SJT
Recent Comments | Responses to Comments
China Study author Colin Campbell slaps down critic
My sentiments exactly!
Posted by: 
SJT replied to comment from eatreal
| February 15, 2012 11:46 PM
| Reply
Score: -3 (9 votes cast)
SJT replied to comment from eatreal
| February 15, 2012 11:46 PM
| Reply
Score: -3 (9 votes cast)
Recent Comments | Responses to Comments
China Study author Colin Campbell slaps down critic
Ah, Denise -- the Michelle Malkin of the meat industry!
China Study author Colin Campbell slaps down critic
Congratulations Mrs Minger for study in depth the subject. For his clear explanation. A notice of Languedoc in France
China Study author Colin Campbell slaps down critic
Mark, Spark's question is valid, in fact anybody's questions are valid, and he was quite reasonable. His question is interesting, and KEY to go from a somewhat informed omnivorous diet to an informed vegan/vegetarian diet, when Health is what is valued. I am vegetarian more because of my ethics than health, but some people are more interested in what diet would be optimal, not ethical. Plus defining well what an optimal diet REALLY is, its important regardless. A diet abundant with vegetables & leafy greens, herbs, Ancient grains (no wheat), some tubers & fruit, and supplemented with some quality animal protein and fat seems to be close to optimal, from what I've learned. Personally Im only interested in optimizing my vegetarian diet, but still itch to know what would be optimal, and what diets are best for treating & preventing illnesses like cancer. Steve Jobs didnt survive his cancer, and he was seemingly going with the Ornish approach (I am aware of the other problems that may have gotten in the way of sucessful diet/lifestyle intervention), now I would love to see someone that believes in a lower carb, meat, fat & plant rich diet, intervene with THAT diet and see if its more protective.
China Study author Colin Campbell slaps down critic
Would you take Ancel Keys seriously, simply because he was a Scientist? What about his flawed Lipid Hypothesis?
All people -- Scientists, Doctors, English Majors -- are fallible. The person of value and integrity is the one that can say "In light of this new data, I can see that my previous position was wrong."
People all over the world thrive on a variety of diets. Stop placing people on a pedestal and claiming their way is the "only" or the "right" way.
A fact is only a fact until it's proven wrong.
So many things over the last 50 years (especially) have been proven wrong. Yet, we keep the misinformation alive in the collective psyche by continuing to regurgitate it without actually doing our own research.
Example: "Everyone KNOWS that saturated fat causes heart disease!" Right? WRONG!
I'm not trying to convince anyone to eat meat, not eat meat, or debate anyone about the ethics of eating animals. That's none of my business.
What I AM suggesting, however, is to become TRULY informed, before rendering a life-altering decision about what you put into your body. Then, living with the consequences of your decision.
This means going beyond the headlines of CNN and Yahoo. It also means going into the opposition's camp with an inquisitive mind and a desire to find what's true for you -- not simply for the sake of being "right."
In closing, no matter what path people follow, I hope they do it with enough information from ALL sides. Then, they become responsible for their own health, rather than abdicating it to others. When we get so entrenched in a position, we become more concerned about being "right" than being "correct." I wish for everyone to thrive.
Posted by:
Ancestral_Eating replied to comment from eatreal
| March 23, 2013 12:28 PM
| Reply
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Ancestral_Eating replied to comment from eatreal
| March 23, 2013 12:28 PM
| Reply
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Recent Posts
No posts published so far.
My sentiments exactly!