|
Those who have studied Christian history know that divisions among
the faithful occurred fairly early. Councils like the one held at
Nicaea in 325 document attempts to re-standardize Christian doctrine
and unite disparate communities of believers. Breakups like the
Great Schism of 1054 that divided the Roman and Eastern rites remind
us that these attempts often failed. This book illustrates that
the first splitting of Christians into factions occurred even earlier
than most people realize. In fact, the author suggests that it started
during the time of the New Testament narratives and among the apostles
themselves. One premise that may rankle conservative Christians
is that Paul was the first and most important modifier of the faith
that Jesus lived and taught.
The book is subtitled Simple Living and Nonviolence in Early
Christianity. Akers carefully details from ancient documents
that the Jerusalem-based apostles taught a somewhat different Gospel
than the one Paul modified so the Christian message would be more
appealing to the Greek and Roman audiences to which he preached.
Bitter debates occurred between Paul and Jesus' appointed leaders
Peter, James, and John. Remnants of those controversies are still
quite visible in today's New Testament. Akers contends, however,
that Paul's faction eventually "won the debate" and ultimately got
to write and pass down the records thereby having the last word,
so to speak.
The following excerpt is a summary of the events of that period.
Rather than coming from a Paul-influenced New Testament view, however,
it’s history as it may have appeared to the "Jewish" Christians
in Jerusalem who ultimately faded into the recesses of history.
Jesus, inspired by a group of Nasaraeans who are vegetarian and
attack animal sacrifice, is baptized by John the Baptist. He proclaims
a Jewish gospel based on a radical interpretation of the universal
law of God a gospel based on simple living, pacifism, and vegetarianism.
He goes to Jerusalem where he protests against the animal sacrifice
business in the temple. He is brutally crucified by the Romans
as a trouble-maker at the instigation of the priests in the temple.
His followers come together at the Pentecost and, after powerful
revelations, declare that Jesus has appeared to them. The priests
in the temple still violently oppose Jesus’ followers, arrest
the apostles, try to kill James the brother of Jesus, and kill
at least one other prominent follower (Stephen). They are checked
by the more moderate Pharisees. The sect survives and grows.
The Jesus movement gains adherents and a new twist with Paul.
Paul, on the basis of his own visions and independently of the
other followers of Jesus, preaches adherence to a Jesus who is
more than a prophet--a Jesus who does not merely proclaim the
law but actually replaces it. Controversy is introduced to the
early church. Paul and the Jewish followers of Jesus disagree
over the Jewish law and over various food issues (eating meat,
eating food offered to idols). Prominent members of the followers
of Jesus, including his brother James and all of the apostles,
are vegetarian; but the question of whether vegetarianism is required
is sharply disputed by Paul (Romans 14). Many of the followers
of Jesus are "zealous for the law" (Acts 21:20), but
Paul denies that this is necessary at all. The disputes grow and
divisions deepen.
The author meticulously points out that the "law" promoted by Jesus
and the Jerusalem Christians is not the same detailed, ritualistic,
rabbinic code promoted by Jesus' antagonists--the temple priests,
Pharisees and Sadducees--and which has evolved to form the basis
of the various expressions of Judaism today. Instead, this Christian/Jewish
law is a simple, literal interpretation of the Ten Commandments
including a strong emphasis on non-worldly living and eschewing
all violence toward humans or animals.
Akers provides ample historical detail to show how the persecution
of Christianity proved unsurviveable in Jerusalem but not in Rome
and why Pauline Christianity was able to eventually become the official
state religion of the Roman Empire in less than 300 years. Basically,
this occurred because the church embraced a few of the empire's
values, such as a tolerance of personal materialism, an acceptance
of patriotically based violence, and eating the standard diet of
the culture which included meat.
The faults I found in this book were an occasional poorly developed
argument and some incompleteness in the indexing and footnoting.
These defects, however, are more than offset by a clear, consistent
presentation of facts gathered from an impressive array of ancient
authors including Flavius Josephus, Epiphanius, Clement, Jerome,
Origen and others as well as citations of the views of several modern
scholars of early Christianity. Akers’ logic and writing style seem
"borderline academic," but his development is very easy
to follow resulting in a very pleasant read.
For someone who wants to be equipped the next time the discussion
turns to, "Was Jesus a vegetarian?" this book provides substantive
answers. Let's hope, however, that they will be more than
just "bullets for battle." Remember, we veggies want to maintain
our mellow image. So, please be nice, everyone.
Jim Catano jimcatano@att.net
|